[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: position() ne last()

Subject: Re: position() ne last()
From: Vyacheslav Sedov <vyacheslav.sedov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:49:25 +0300
Re:  position() ne last()
<xsl:template match="para[following-sibling::para]">
       <br/><xsl:next-match/>
</xsl:template>

"P:QP0QP:P>QQQ - QP5QQQP0 QP0P;P0P=QP0" (Q) PP=QP>P=
PP0P2P;P>P2P8Q P'P5QP>P2

2009/12/3 Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>:
> That's remarkable. Somehow it is similar to the prepend optimization I
> wrote about in my blog last December:
>
> B http://dnovatchev.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!44B0A32C2CCF7488!981.entry
>
> Does a catalog of such optimizations exist?
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Dimitre Novatchev
> ---------------------------------------
> Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
> ---------------------------------------
> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
> -------------------------------------
> Never fight an inanimate object
> -------------------------------------
> You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
> you're doing is work or play
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> A little coding tip. I've no idea why this hasn't come up before. It's
very
>> common to write things like
>>
>> <xsl:for-each select="para">
>> B <xsl:apply-templates/>
>> B <xsl:if test="position() ne last()">
>> B  B  <br/>
>> B </xsl:if>
>> </xsl:for-each>
>>
>> But a much better way of coding this is:
>>
>> <xsl:for-each select="para">
>> B <xsl:if test="position() ne 1">
>> B  B  <br/>
>> B </xsl:if>
>> B <xsl:apply-templates/>
>> </xsl:for-each>
>>
>> Why? Because however hard the optimizer works, the last() function is hard
>> work: it involves some kind of lookahead. With "position() ne last()" the
>> lookahead might be limited to one element, but it's still a lot more
>> complicated than testing whether the position is 1.
>>
>> With streaming coming along, the latter formulation is also more likely to
>> be streamable (because lookahead is impossible with streaming).
>>
>> I might think about doing the above rewrite automatically...
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Michael Kay
>> http://www.saxonica.com/
>> http://twitter.com/michaelhkay

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.