[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] [no subject]As suggested by Ken, while the tree is being constructed, some parts of it may be serialized without even the whole of the tree being formed in memory. This theory makes me feel, the XSLT 2.0 spec is correct in the current form (as regards to the point we are discussing). Also, as mentioned by Mike, that a user might want something like, <x xsi:type=xs:date> in the output. In this case the default provided by the processor (i.e., generating the xs: declaration) is helpful. The spec has to balance, what the processor should do for the user (for this discussion, generating xs: declaration for the user), and what the user can do (like doing exclude-result-prefixes in the stylesheet). The WG already has had years of discussions finalizing this decision, and potential implementers agree to this, so I think it should be fine. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|