[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated

Subject: RE: A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:31:59 +0100
RE:  A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated
> yes it's a bit odd really that the let clause of FLWOR didn't 
> survive into XPath's For expression.

Some people wanted less of the FLWOR expression to make into XPath, some
wanted more. As often happens, the compromise that ended up in the spec was
agreed early on, and never changed because there was never a majority in
favour of any proposal to change it. 

I think it's also an odd omission that XPath has no sorting capability,
though I'm glad the XQuery "order by", with its strange tuple-based
semantics, didn't make it in.

Michael Kay

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.