[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated
andrew welch wrote:
On 7/14/06, Nic James Ferrier <nferrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: completely echo this statement, I was skeptical during the early speccing/development of XSLT 2.0 esp with dependency on XML Schema, etc.. The stuff I dont like thankfully stays out of one's way enough; though there are still some non-intuitive type castings...it really isnt a problem compared with some of the black magic we perform in XSLT 1.0. All in all I feel that XSLT 2.0 has removed all the voodoo (grouping anyone) that we had to do in XSLT 1.0 and given some very expressive and powerful mechanisms with which to get real work done. I think that it must be a record for a v1 and v2 of a specification to get things so right; congrats to all who made it possible. Now all we need is microsoft to push getting a XSLT 2.0 built and integrated with their browser/.NET platform; then we would be cooking with gas. cheers, Jim Fuller
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|