[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: xslt/xpath 2.0 comments ( long )

Subject: RE: xslt/xpath 2.0 comments ( long )
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:04:16 -0000
michael kay comments
> I might be misunderstanding you, but it seems to me that given that
> the user is writing a wrapper function, they should be putting that
> wrapper function in their own namespace rather than the one for
> Saxon extensions.  So this is consistent with or supports the idea
> of the processor giving an error when one of its extension functions
> are redefined.

Of course they should use their own namespace. But when writing the spec, we
have to say what happens if they don't.

Mike Kay

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.