[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: The evaluate function

Subject: RE: The evaluate function
From: Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:46:03 -0500
RE:  The evaluate function
I knew I'd be tapping into some controversy... Just didn't know how fierce

I'm still unclear how the addition of a dynamic eval, if implemented as a
function, would violate the assumption that all (other) expressions are
static.  Would it be possible to treat these as special and treat the rest
as optimizable?

> Without answering your question, I'll address what I think you're implying

No implication intended. I really do want to know which processors don't
support the eval function. If I end up relying on the existence of such a
capability (without the support of the standard) I'd at least like to know
that it's generally available. (Yes, I know, bad practice in the standards
> Introducing evaluate() now, IMHO, would be an example of premature

Hmm? Are you saying that it's too early in the language's history to
introduce such a feature (and remove the assumption of static expressions)?
If so, wouldn't it be an example of premature de-optimization ;-)


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.