Re: use cases for d-o-e

roger.day@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> FWIW, and I'm just a person on the top of a Clapham Omnibus, if it's gotten rid
> of, there should be replacements - particularly for 4, which has recently bitten
> me. 

That was emmitting a document declaration with an internal DTD subset into the
result.

> That's not an abuse - that's a workaround.
Hmmmmmm. Are you *sure* you can't do this in any other fashion? For example,
use the new multiple output facility to write a new DTD file and refer to it in
the result using doctype-system in xsl:output.

> However, isn't this covered by
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#xml-output, Appendix F Representation of Lexical
> XML Constructs (Non-Normative)? So cases 3 and 4 should be fixed in XSLT 2.0
> implementations....I think.

My fix: drop DTD support (which includes dropping entity support). Use a XSchema
instead.
 :-) :-)

Regards
J.Pietschmann

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list