[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: . in for

Subject: Re: . in for
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:55:40 -0800 (PST)
 Re: . in for
[snipped a very nice and perfectly understandable argumentation for a mapping

> I can see two drawbacks to using a simple mapping operator rather than
> a for expression, because the context item is used rather than there
> being explicit variable bindings for range variables:
>  - you cannot iterate over several sequences at the same time
>  - you cannot have right operands that use the value of the item from
>    the left operand within a predicate


This is the only part of your message, which seems not to be 100% clear.

Could you, please, provide concrete examples (expressions) that would be
illegal/would not work?


Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.