[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSL performance problem
I must concur with Paul, and I also want to note that your stated times don't even seem to be in the same ballpark as ours, although a million variable could account for the difference. At the JavaLobby site (http://www.javalobby.org) we dynamically generate and deliver over 10,000 page views every single day from our AMD K6-200 running Solaris x86. Our typical cpu load averages about 2% for this processing, though it sometimes spikes sharply - and the typical page production time is minimal, probably around 200 ms for the full cycle (including servlet overhead, business logic and XML/XSL transformation). We don't have hard numbers, but this is a real-world example of XML/XSL doing the the job right now, and it has been for over 6 months! Regards, Rick Ross Paul Prescod wrote: > > Sebastien Sahuc wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > I know there is nothing comparable to what I'm arguing, structure of > > xml and xsl documents can sensibly affect the result, but I'm really > > surprised not to get better results. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|