Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script...

David Carlisle wrote:

> > The biggest problem for me, which I have brought up on this list before, is the lack
> > of support for entity attributes.
>
> OK fair enough it's clear there is currently no support for those.
> But just as clearly if they are needed, one could loby for explicit
> support to be added to XSL without just adding arbitrary procedural
> code in script tags, so it is not really an argument for script is it?

No, it is an argument for complete support of the XML spec. I would prefer this to a
script tag any day.

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@xxxxxxx


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list