[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: <xsl-script>
James Robertson wrote: > > Yes, the full copy of Omnimark is very expensive. > But when you factor in all the real costs of > using other tools, I think it stacks up pretty > well. No doubt that is true for you but most people will have a different cost/benefit analysis. > How many hours have people spent chasing > the XSL spec now, and finding ways of making > code work in broken implentations? That's hardly any prediction of XSL's future. People chase the spec. because they want to learn about what they will be using in the future. > And XSL will never match the full functionality > of Omnimark. That's probably true. And Omnimark does not yet match the full functionality of XSL. They use a completely different model and have completely different strengths and goals. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco Earth will soon support only survivor species -- dandelions, roaches, lizards, thistles, crows, rats. Not to mention 10 billion humans. - Planet of the Weeds, Harper's Magazine, October 1998 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|