[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XLink: behavior must go!

Subject: Re: XLink: behavior must go!
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 10:48:59 -0400
st laurent go carts
At 09:13 AM 5/13/99 -0400, Jonathan Borden wrote:
>    Is there anything within XLink itself that cannot be replaced by XSLT
>now that doc() and docref() have been defined? Does XLink not become
>something akin to a standard set of XSLT templates used for handling URI
>traversal? doc() and docref(), as well as unification with XPointer turn
>XSLT into a generalized graph transformation language. Could the XLink spec
>itself become an XSLT include file?

Er... just everything.

One of the key points of XLink is that it is _not_ bonded to a particular
style sheet language.  XLink is useful in contexts where XSLT is either too
much or too little, and provides common vocabulary that document developers
can use to describe links whatever final processing the documents may receive.

If your question is rephrased: 

"Is there anything within XLink itself that cannot be implemented by XSLT?"

Then it might be received a little more kindly by those of us who work with
XML in contexts where XSL (indeed style sheets, at times) is unnecessary.

Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (June)
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.