[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Language choice (was: Re: Interactive XML)

Subject: Re: Language choice (was: Re: Interactive XML)
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 13:22:30 -0500
language choice
Bill Lindsey wrote:
> I've looked, but I can't find it.  Shouldn't there be something in the
> requirements draft that I could point to and say "Aha, this is why
> XML + Javascript (er, ECMAScript) syntax is a better choice than Scheme
> syntax"?  In my opinion, if the choice is to be considered justified,
> the basis ought to be more explicit.

Specifications are not supposed to justify every decision that is made.
They just specify. Motivation is typically only given where it will
clarify implementation and usage issues, ("now I see what the feature is
there for") not as justification.

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

Three things trust above all else: Your knowledge of your craft
That someone turns a profit, and that you will get the shaft

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.