Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 21/04/2023 00:03, l@tlo wrote: ... What needs to be changed is ... - XSL Formatting Objects (XSL-FO)is now just called "XSL" (as the link seems to indicate). The reverse, actually. It's the original "XSL" that might as well now be called just "XSL-FO". As Norm said on the 14th: Originally, the “Extensible Style Language” was a transformation part and an XML vocabulary for defining layout. The transformation part was broken out as XSLT but is still conceptually part of XSL. Chapter 2, XSL Transformation, of the XSL 1.1 Recommendation [1] includes: The Tree Construction is described in "XSL Transformations" [XSLT]. and: The provisions in "XSL Transformations" form an integral part of this Recommendation and are considered normative. The XSL Recommendation didn't let go of the idea that XSL is both transformation and formatting, but, in practice, people read the XSL spec to find out about the formatting objects, not to find out about transformations. Regards, Tony Graham. -- Senior Architect XML Division Antenna House, Inc. ---- Skerries, Ireland tgraham@a... [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#d0e386
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
