[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?

• From: Arjun Ray <arayq2@gmail.com>
• To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
• Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 10:42:42 -0400

 On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:35:27 +0100, Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie>
wrote:

| I am not convinced that the campaign for "simplification" of XML is 
| a viable candidate for our attention.

Deep-sixing namespaces would be first on my (rather short) list. 

• References:
  • What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?
    • From: Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org>
  • Re: What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
  • Re: What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
  • Re: What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?
    • From: Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie>