XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by date - February, 2012

• Re: The edge of chaos: where syntax ends andinterpretation begins
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 29 Feb 2012 17:57:38 -0000
• Re: The edge of chaos: where syntax ends andinterpretation begins
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 29 Feb 2012 17:35:57 -0000
• Re: The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins
  • From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 29 Feb 2012 16:18:03 -0000
• RE: The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 29 Feb 2012 15:37:41 -0000
• Re: The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretationbegins
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 29 Feb 2012 15:29:11 -0000
• RE: The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 29 Feb 2012 15:20:31 -0000
• RE: Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 29 Feb 2012 15:16:03 -0000
• Re: The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretationbegins
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 29 Feb 2012 15:07:51 -0000
• The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Feb 2012 14:59:18 -0000
• Re: Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 29 Feb 2012 14:47:16 -0000
• Re: Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?
  • From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 29 Feb 2012 14:32:35 -0000
• Re: Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 29 Feb 2012 14:05:38 -0000
• Re: Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 29 Feb 2012 14:03:23 -0000
• RE: Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 29 Feb 2012 14:02:00 -0000
• Re: Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?
  • From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 29 Feb 2012 13:51:02 -0000
• Re: Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?
  • From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 29 Feb 2012 13:33:38 -0000
• Re: Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 29 Feb 2012 13:21:58 -0000
• Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Feb 2012 13:08:01 -0000
• RE: Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 28 Feb 2012 22:17:37 -0000
• Re: Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 28 Feb 2012 22:06:18 -0000
• Re: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com> on 28 Feb 2012 19:28:14 -0000
• Re: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 28 Feb 2012 19:11:12 -0000
• RE: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 28 Feb 2012 18:57:43 -0000
• RE: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 28 Feb 2012 18:49:43 -0000
• RE: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 28 Feb 2012 18:45:50 -0000
• Re: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 28 Feb 2012 18:44:59 -0000
• RE: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 28 Feb 2012 18:35:53 -0000
• Re: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com> on 28 Feb 2012 18:34:29 -0000
• Re: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Feb 2012 18:31:05 -0000
• RE: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 28 Feb 2012 18:15:36 -0000
• Re: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 28 Feb 2012 18:12:59 -0000
• XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 28 Feb 2012 18:06:42 -0000
• Re: Correct xml:lang value for Pinyin Chinese vs Simplified Chinese
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 28 Feb 2012 00:41:09 -0000
• RE: What does "optional" mean?
  • From "Rudder, Doug Jr" <Doug.Rudder@wolterskluwer.com> on 27 Feb 2012 18:47:09 -0000
• RE: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 27 Feb 2012 18:17:30 -0000
• Re: Correct xml:lang value for Pinyin Chinese vsSimplified Chinese
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 27 Feb 2012 16:55:41 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 27 Feb 2012 16:30:10 -0000
• Re: Correct xml:lang value for Pinyin Chinese vs Simplified Chinese
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 27 Feb 2012 16:25:49 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 27 Feb 2012 16:13:43 -0000
• Re: Correct xml:lang value for Pinyin Chinese vsSimplified Chinese
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 27 Feb 2012 15:38:37 -0000
• RE: What does "optional" mean?
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 27 Feb 2012 15:37:00 -0000
• Re: A tool that takes an XML document of points as inputand plots the points on a graph and connects the dots?
  • From Lech Rzedzicki <xchaotic@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2012 11:16:00 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2012 10:28:01 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2012 10:15:53 -0000
• Re: Correct xml:lang value for Pinyin Chinese vs Simplified Chinese
  • From Lech Rzedzicki <xchaotic@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2012 10:09:07 -0000
• Correct xml:lang value for Pinyin Chinese vs Simplified Chinese
  • From Lech Rzedzicki <xchaotic@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2012 09:06:25 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Feb 2012 08:35:49 -0000
• RE: What does "optional" mean?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 27 Feb 2012 03:41:06 -0000
• RE: What does "optional" mean?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 27 Feb 2012 03:34:18 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Feb 2012 00:38:13 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2012 22:45:27 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 26 Feb 2012 22:42:41 -0000
• RE: What does "optional" mean?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 26 Feb 2012 22:36:02 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 26 Feb 2012 22:15:46 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 26 Feb 2012 20:45:16 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 26 Feb 2012 20:25:51 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 26 Feb 2012 20:18:54 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 26 Feb 2012 18:18:09 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 26 Feb 2012 17:47:54 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Feb 2012 16:54:11 -0000
• RE: What does "optional" mean?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 26 Feb 2012 16:31:36 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> on 26 Feb 2012 16:20:30 -0000
• RE: What does "optional" mean?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 26 Feb 2012 16:16:33 -0000
• RE: What does "optional" mean?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 26 Feb 2012 16:10:44 -0000
• RE: What does "optional" mean?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 26 Feb 2012 15:11:14 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2012 14:52:18 -0000
• Re: What does "optional" mean?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 26 Feb 2012 14:31:38 -0000
• What does "optional" mean?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 26 Feb 2012 14:11:38 -0000
• RE: When is an XML vocabulary too =?UTF-8?Q?complex=3F=20The=20?==?UTF-8?Q?art=20and=20science=20of=20creating=20large=2C=20complex=20voca?==?UTF-8?Q?bularies=20that=20are=20amenable=20to=20teaching=2C=20learning?==?UTF-8?Q?=2C=20and=20using=2E?=
  • From <w3c@drrw.info> on 26 Feb 2012 02:16:47 -0000
• RE: When is an XML vocabulary too complex? The art and science of creating large, complex vocabularies that are amenable to teaching, learning, and using.
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 25 Feb 2012 21:18:33 -0000
• Re: When is an XML vocabulary too complex? The art andscience of creating large, complex vocabularies that are amenable to teaching,learning, and using.
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 25 Feb 2012 20:35:03 -0000
• Re: When is an XML vocabulary too complex? The art and science of creating large, complex vocabularies that are amenable to teaching, learning, and using.
  • From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 25 Feb 2012 20:01:24 -0000
• When is an XML vocabulary too complex? The art and science ofcreating large, complex vocabularies that are amenable to teaching,learning, and using.
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 25 Feb 2012 19:43:13 -0000
• wispr
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 25 Feb 2012 10:55:36 -0000
• Re: Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 25 Feb 2012 10:24:03 -0000
• Re: Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 25 Feb 2012 10:12:54 -0000
• RE: RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 24 Feb 2012 22:58:34 -0000
• RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 24 Feb 2012 22:58:33 -0000
• Re: Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 24 Feb 2012 18:22:59 -0000
• Re: Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 24 Feb 2012 17:21:43 -0000
• Re: Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 24 Feb 2012 17:19:35 -0000
• Re: Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 24 Feb 2012 17:16:42 -0000
• Re: Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 24 Feb 2012 17:09:05 -0000
• Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 24 Feb 2012 16:31:17 -0000
• RE: A tool that takes an XML document of points as input and plotsthe points on a graph and connects the dots?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 23 Feb 2012 22:41:47 -0000
• RE: A tool that takes an XML document of points as input and plotsthe points on a graph and connects the dots? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  • From <Nicholas.Ardlie@ga.gov.au> on 23 Feb 2012 22:36:23 -0000
• Re: A tool that takes an XML document of points as input and plots the points on a graph and connects the dots?
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 23 Feb 2012 22:29:22 -0000
• Re: A tool that takes an XML document of points as input andplots the points on a graph and connects the dots?
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 23 Feb 2012 21:57:28 -0000
• RE: A tool that takes an XML document of points as input and plots the points on a graph and connects the dots?
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 23 Feb 2012 21:46:16 -0000
• A tool that takes an XML document of points as input and plots thepoints on a graph and connects the dots?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 23 Feb 2012 21:19:11 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2012 12:53:30 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2012 12:37:53 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 23 Feb 2012 11:36:20 -0000
• Re: RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2012 10:00:34 -0000
• Re: RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 23 Feb 2012 09:29:45 -0000
• RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 23 Feb 2012 01:17:54 -0000
• RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 23 Feb 2012 00:45:11 -0000
• RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 23 Feb 2012 00:19:08 -0000
• Re: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From dvint@dvint.com on 22 Feb 2012 22:54:42 -0000
• Re: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From Lech Rzedzicki <xchaotic@gmail.com> on 22 Feb 2012 22:09:51 -0000
• RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 22 Feb 2012 21:51:50 -0000
• Re: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Betty Harvey" <harvey@eccnet.com> on 22 Feb 2012 21:21:17 -0000
• RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 22 Feb 2012 20:59:30 -0000
• RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 22 Feb 2012 20:31:12 -0000
• Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 22 Feb 2012 20:22:46 -0000
• [ANN] Qizx 4.4p1 is available
  • From Olivier Ishacian <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 22 Feb 2012 17:08:21 -0000
• RE: RDF people, please define "surface syntax" and "concrete syntax"
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 22 Feb 2012 16:00:59 -0000
• RE: [ Conference ] What is Good XML? How Can We Tell?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 22 Feb 2012 00:56:40 -0000
• Re: functional databases noodling ...
  • From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 21 Feb 2012 08:59:20 -0000
• RE: functional databases noodling ...
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 20 Feb 2012 20:57:58 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming =?UTF-8?Q?convention=3F?=
  • From <w3c@drrw.info> on 20 Feb 2012 19:25:08 -0000
• RE: Stability of schemas -- frequency of versioning
  • From <w3c@drrw.info> on 20 Feb 2012 17:53:45 -0000
• Re: RE: RDF people, please define "surface syntax" and"concrete syntax"
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 20 Feb 2012 17:47:50 -0000
• RE: RDF people, please define "surface syntax" and "concrete syntax"
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 20 Feb 2012 17:22:07 -0000
• Re: RDF people, please define "surface syntax" and "concrete syntax"
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 20 Feb 2012 17:03:57 -0000
• Re: RDF people, please define "surface syntax" and "concrete syntax"
  • From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 20 Feb 2012 14:35:36 -0000
• RDF people, please define "surface syntax" and "concrete syntax"
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 20 Feb 2012 12:49:26 -0000
• Re: RE: What is "syntactic identity"? What is "surfacesyntax"?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 19 Feb 2012 21:30:10 -0000
• RE: What is "syntactic identity"? What is "surface syntax"?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Feb 2012 19:32:10 -0000
• functional databases noodling ...
  • From Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com> on 16 Feb 2012 20:34:43 -0000
• Re: Stability of schemas -- frequency of versioning
  • From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 16 Feb 2012 06:44:34 -0000
• RE: Stability of schemas -- frequency of versioning
  • From <w3c@drrw.info> on 16 Feb 2012 06:21:07 -0000
• RE: Noob: XML validation capabilities beyond schemas
  • From <w3c@drrw.info> on 16 Feb 2012 06:03:33 -0000
• New CAMeditor XML open source toolkit release 2.1.1 and Podcast available.
  • From <w3c@drrw.info> on 16 Feb 2012 05:52:54 -0000
• CAMV validation framework v2.01 now available
  • From <w3c@drrw.info> on 16 Feb 2012 05:52:11 -0000
• RE: [ Conference ] What is Good =?UTF-8?Q?XML=3F=20How=20Can=20?==?UTF-8?Q?We=20Tell=3F?=
  • From <w3c@drrw.info> on 16 Feb 2012 05:42:08 -0000
• Re: functional databases noodling ...
  • From Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 16 Feb 2012 00:09:12 -0000
• Re: functional databases noodling ...
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Feb 2012 20:23:57 -0000
• Re: functional databases noodling ...
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 15 Feb 2012 19:44:55 -0000
• [ Conference ] What is Good XML? How Can We Tell?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 15 Feb 2012 18:38:03 -0000
• Re: functional databases noodling ...
  • From daniela florescu <dflorescu@mac.com> on 15 Feb 2012 18:07:43 -0000
• Re: functional databases noodling ...
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 15 Feb 2012 17:50:11 -0000
• Re: functional databases noodling ...
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Feb 2012 08:07:51 -0000
• Re: functional databases noodling ...
  • From daniela florescu <dflorescu@mac.com> on 15 Feb 2012 01:58:40 -0000
• Re: functional databases noodling ...
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 14 Feb 2012 17:57:56 -0000
• Re: functional databases noodling ...
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Feb 2012 17:31:40 -0000
• What is Good XML? How Can We Tell?
  • From Tommie Usdin <btusdin@mulberrytech.com> on 14 Feb 2012 16:29:57 -0000
• functional databases noodling ...
  • From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 14 Feb 2012 08:57:46 -0000
• What is "syntactic identity"? What is "surface syntax"?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Feb 2012 11:34:24 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 10 Feb 2012 17:40:53 -0000
• Re: Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5
  • From Rob Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 10 Feb 2012 17:28:41 -0000
• Re: Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 10 Feb 2012 14:19:05 -0000
• RE: Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 10 Feb 2012 14:02:55 -0000
• Re: Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 10 Feb 2012 10:42:11 -0000
• Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5
  • From Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com> on 10 Feb 2012 10:26:29 -0000
• [ANN] BaseX 7.1: The XMLPrague 2012 Edition
  • From Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> on 7 Feb 2012 23:43:55 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 7 Feb 2012 02:35:22 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 7 Feb 2012 02:27:51 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 7 Feb 2012 02:22:25 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 7 Feb 2012 00:20:55 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existingXML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Feb 2012 00:14:22 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 7 Feb 2012 00:11:15 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 6 Feb 2012 23:32:37 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 6 Feb 2012 23:22:35 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Greg Hunt <greg@firmansyah.com> on 6 Feb 2012 22:41:21 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 6 Feb 2012 22:24:38 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Greg Hunt <greg@firmansyah.com> on 6 Feb 2012 22:15:07 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2012 22:02:49 -0000
• book for beginners
  • From Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com> on 6 Feb 2012 21:59:49 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 6 Feb 2012 21:38:40 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Greg Hunt <greg@firmansyah.com> on 6 Feb 2012 21:28:42 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 6 Feb 2012 21:12:10 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Greg Hunt <greg@firmansyah.com> on 6 Feb 2012 21:06:56 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 6 Feb 2012 18:53:07 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2012 18:24:53 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 6 Feb 2012 18:07:08 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 6 Feb 2012 18:02:40 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 6 Feb 2012 17:54:00 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 6 Feb 2012 17:45:31 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2012 17:44:38 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 6 Feb 2012 17:03:19 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 6 Feb 2012 16:36:32 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 6 Feb 2012 16:12:55 -0000
• Re: PCDATA element type and CDATA attribute type
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 6 Feb 2012 16:04:59 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 6 Feb 2012 15:58:01 -0000
• Re: PCDATA element type and CDATA attribute type
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 6 Feb 2012 15:49:20 -0000
• PCDATA element type and CDATA attribute type
  • From Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2012 15:31:34 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 6 Feb 2012 15:30:04 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 6 Feb 2012 14:16:01 -0000
• Re: XML data sets with (known) data quality problems
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2012 14:02:47 -0000
• XML data sets with (known) data quality problems
  • From Helena Galhardas <helena.galhardas@ist.utl.pt> on 6 Feb 2012 13:44:13 -0000
• RE: book for beginners
  • From Michael Hopwood <michael@editeur.org> on 6 Feb 2012 12:13:30 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 6 Feb 2012 11:09:56 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 6 Feb 2012 01:26:48 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Feb 2012 20:59:17 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 5 Feb 2012 19:59:49 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 5 Feb 2012 19:00:16 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 5 Feb 2012 16:43:00 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 5 Feb 2012 16:27:32 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 5 Feb 2012 16:15:30 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 5 Feb 2012 16:10:25 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 5 Feb 2012 16:05:33 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 5 Feb 2012 16:00:15 -0000
• RE: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML vocabularies
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 5 Feb 2012 15:58:27 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 4 Feb 2012 23:08:15 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "O.J." <olivier.jeulin@gmail.com> on 4 Feb 2012 22:54:59 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 4 Feb 2012 22:52:46 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existingXML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 4 Feb 2012 22:02:01 -0000
• Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabularies
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 4 Feb 2012 21:59:37 -0000
• Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabularies
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 4 Feb 2012 21:58:08 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 4 Feb 2012 21:58:03 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 4 Feb 2012 21:54:45 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 4 Feb 2012 21:54:07 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 4 Feb 2012 21:50:21 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existingXML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 4 Feb 2012 21:45:59 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 4 Feb 2012 21:40:53 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 4 Feb 2012 21:34:58 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 4 Feb 2012 21:26:07 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 4 Feb 2012 20:33:08 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 4 Feb 2012 20:31:56 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 4 Feb 2012 20:31:30 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 4 Feb 2012 18:09:08 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 4 Feb 2012 12:07:02 -0000
• Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 4 Feb 2012 08:05:13 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Rob Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 4 Feb 2012 03:37:14 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 4 Feb 2012 03:27:34 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Rob Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 4 Feb 2012 03:09:57 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Greg Hunt <greg@firmansyah.com> on 4 Feb 2012 03:01:58 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Rob Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 4 Feb 2012 02:39:50 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 4 Feb 2012 02:38:01 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 4 Feb 2012 01:43:30 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 4 Feb 2012 01:27:22 -0000
• Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabularies
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 4 Feb 2012 01:19:40 -0000
• RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 4 Feb 2012 00:16:38 -0000
• RE: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML vocabularies
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 4 Feb 2012 00:09:16 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 3 Feb 2012 23:40:36 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 3 Feb 2012 23:34:54 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existingXML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2012 23:04:24 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2012 22:58:49 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 3 Feb 2012 22:26:21 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 3 Feb 2012 22:20:46 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 3 Feb 2012 20:37:42 -0000
• Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabularies
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 3 Feb 2012 20:30:36 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "=?utf-8?b?Vy4gSHVnaCBDaGF0ZmllbGQ=?=" <csi2000@urbanmarket.com> on 3 Feb 2012 20:28:26 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 3 Feb 2012 20:18:35 -0000
• Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 20:11:21 -0000
• Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 3 Feb 2012 19:14:38 -0000
• Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML vocabularies
  • From Robin Cover <robin@oasis-open.org> on 3 Feb 2012 19:09:31 -0000
• Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 3 Feb 2012 19:01:18 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From John Turnbull <johnadamturnbull@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 18:49:13 -0000
• Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 3 Feb 2012 18:07:06 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 3 Feb 2012 17:31:00 -0000
• Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabularies
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 3 Feb 2012 17:23:28 -0000
• Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 17:14:25 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 3 Feb 2012 17:11:27 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 3 Feb 2012 17:11:24 -0000
• Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 16:56:50 -0000
• Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 16:24:12 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 3 Feb 2012 16:13:54 -0000
• Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 3 Feb 2012 16:05:21 -0000
• Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabularies
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2012 16:00:46 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 3 Feb 2012 15:46:14 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 15:45:22 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 3 Feb 2012 15:36:02 -0000
• Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML vocabularies
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 3 Feb 2012 14:49:02 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 3 Feb 2012 14:43:58 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 3 Feb 2012 14:34:02 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 3 Feb 2012 14:29:09 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 12:54:27 -0000
• Schematron and RNG, RNC
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 12:18:17 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 3 Feb 2012 11:05:22 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 10:10:53 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 09:57:09 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2012 09:38:23 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 3 Feb 2012 00:12:33 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 00:11:15 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 3 Feb 2012 00:07:06 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2012 23:22:17 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 2 Feb 2012 22:21:19 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 2 Feb 2012 22:16:27 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2012 15:37:46 -0000
• RE: book for beginners
  • From Norm Birkett <Norm.Birkett@reval.com> on 2 Feb 2012 15:16:40 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 2 Feb 2012 15:12:27 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 2 Feb 2012 14:46:00 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 2 Feb 2012 14:41:54 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changingtechnologies?
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 2 Feb 2012 14:25:17 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 2 Feb 2012 09:29:07 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 2 Feb 2012 09:18:30 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?
  • From Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2012 08:04:29 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changingtechnologies?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 2 Feb 2012 04:59:45 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?
  • From Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 2 Feb 2012 04:11:55 -0000
• SGML/XML/XSLT Tools developer/IETM developer Opportunity
  • From Dan Vint <dvint@dvint.com> on 2 Feb 2012 00:40:54 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2012 00:20:45 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changingtechnologies?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 1 Feb 2012 22:26:07 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?
  • From Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2012 22:15:49 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changingtechnologies?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 1 Feb 2012 21:55:16 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?
  • From Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2012 21:30:22 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 1 Feb 2012 21:29:34 -0000
• RE: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changingtechnologies?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 1 Feb 2012 21:15:50 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 1 Feb 2012 21:11:42 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 1 Feb 2012 21:02:55 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 1 Feb 2012 20:55:59 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changingtechnologies?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 1 Feb 2012 20:45:42 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2012 20:19:48 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changingtechnologies?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 1 Feb 2012 19:56:42 -0000
• Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?
  • From Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2012 19:42:09 -0000
• How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 1 Feb 2012 19:30:26 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> on 1 Feb 2012 19:28:34 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 1 Feb 2012 18:53:31 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 1 Feb 2012 18:41:11 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 1 Feb 2012 18:20:21 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 1 Feb 2012 18:08:07 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2012 17:36:31 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 1 Feb 2012 17:30:02 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 1 Feb 2012 17:23:10 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 1 Feb 2012 16:55:22 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 1 Feb 2012 16:53:18 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 1 Feb 2012 16:24:53 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 1 Feb 2012 16:20:04 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 1 Feb 2012 16:11:23 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 1 Feb 2012 16:02:13 -0000
• Re: Creating Context-Dependent Data Models
  • From Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2012 15:54:52 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 1 Feb 2012 15:21:18 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 1 Feb 2012 15:04:31 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 1 Feb 2012 14:54:09 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2012 14:44:37 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 1 Feb 2012 12:09:04 -0000
• RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 1 Feb 2012 11:50:41 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2012 11:22:51 -0000
• Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 1 Feb 2012 08:40:02 -0000