[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: HTML5 and almost no namespaces
With due respects to people who dislike XML namespaces, Consider the following example: The element "name" here represents an organization name. <name xmlns="http://organization-ns">ABC corp</name> The element "name" here represents a person name. <name xmlns="http://person-ns">Jill Doe</name> If I'm presented with either (or both) of these documents, the namespace binding helps me (and my XML application) to make a logical association between the XML markup and to the domain with which it is related to. And we all say that, XML namespaces helps us to avoid name collisions (one of the example of this is given above). I (therefore) personally like XML namespaces. It's an optional feature. If someone doesn't need XML namespaces in an application, the XML software stack allows implementing such a design decision. On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> wrote: > Isn't it merely that the HTML5 (WHATWG) people were among the many > who found Namespaces more easily ignored than implemented? Life is > too short! Roll on 'MicroXML'! :-) > > Still, there may be many who get some value using namespaces in XML. > ---- > Stephen D Green -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|