[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Content Assembly Mechanism (CAM)

• From: Keith Hassen <keith.hassen@gmail.com>
• To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
• Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:54:37 -0400

On 10/7/2009 10:03 AM, Lech Rzedzicki wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> i hope some people from CAM are around so we can discuss those points.
> 
> I hope so too, I really would like to see the effort being pointed in
> the right direction, such as extending one of the existing standards.
> Despite my criticsm, there are some great ideas in there, such as
> featuring code lists and separating business rules from defining XML
> structure. Ideally I would really want to see the best of all schema
> validation engines merged into one some time in the future.

Agreed -- would love to see structure separated cleanly from business 
rules.  Although I suppose you could organize an XSD in this way using 
references.

• References:
  • Content Assembly Mechanism (CAM)
    • From: Cecil New <cecil.new@gmail.com>
  • Re: Content Assembly Mechanism (CAM)
    • From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
  • Re: Content Assembly Mechanism (CAM)
    • From: Lech Rzedzicki <xchaotic@gmail.com>