XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - June, 2002

• Re: Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation?, Rob Lugt
• CHAT: Bagels and lox, John Cowan
• XML Problem, Sebastian A.
  • Re: XML Problem, Thomas B. Passin
    • RE: XML Problem, Sebastian A.
      • Re: XML Problem, Henrik Motakef
• Non-xml syntax for WXS, Sean McGrath
  • Re: Non-xml syntax for WXS, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Non-xml syntax for WXS, J. David Eisenberg
      • Re: Non-xml syntax for WXS, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Non-xml syntax for WXS, J. David Eisenberg
      • RE: Non-xml syntax for WXS, Michael Kay
    • Re: Non-xml syntax for WXS, Eric Bohlman
      • Re: Non-xml syntax for WXS, Jeff Rafter
  • RE: Non-xml syntax for WXS, Michael Fitzgerald
  • RE: Non-xml syntax for WXS, Bill de hÓra
• RE: Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? (was: RE: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML), MAISONNY Benoit
• Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? (was: RE: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML), MAISONNY Benoit
  • Re: Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? (was: RE: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML), Rick Jelliffe
• Unique XForms form that can ...instance data?, tariq abdur-rahim
• Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: XMLSchema for object p rogrammers: was Announce: XML Schema), Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema), Jonathan Borden
• RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema, Bill de hÓra
    • Re: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema, Uche Ogbuji
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema, Danny Ayers
• Re: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • Re: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML, Ann Navarro
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
    • Re: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML, MAISONNY Benoit
  • RE: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML, Ann Navarro
      • Re: XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML, Jonathan Borden
• XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML, MAISONNY Benoit
• Partial validation in RelaxNG?, Gustaf Liljegren
  • Re: Partial validation in RelaxNG?, James Clark
  • Re: Partial validation in RelaxNG?, Jeni Tennison
• Proposal for an introspector collaboration toolchain, James Michael DuPont
• [XPB4J] RE: What's XSLT doing in here?, KUMAR,PANKAJ (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
• [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 1.2 - available also Online as an Applet, George Cristian Bina
• grammar, Nurul Haszeli Ahmad
• RE: Announce: XML Schema,, Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: Announce: XML Schema,, John Cowan
• [ANNOUNCE] XPB4J-0.90: Java Program to measure and compare XML Parsing/Processing performance, KUMAR,PANKAJ (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
• XML schema for non-XML file?, Yaneric Roussel
  • Re: XML schema for non-XML file?, Eric Bohlman
  • RE: XML schema for non-XML file?, Michael Leditschke
• OASIS announcement of Online Dispute Resolution discussion list, Karl F. Best
• RE: Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE, Manos Batsis
  • RE: Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE, Kimberly Hahn
    • Re: Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE, Thomas B. Passin
• Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE, Mike Champion
• RE: [offtopic] A message from the rebellion., Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects, Anderson, John
• Sablotron 0.95, Petr Cimprich
• [ANN] VLDB-EEXTT Call for Participation and Program, Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly lessverbose (andeasier to author) XML), Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
• RE: Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML), Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly lessverbose (andeasier to author) XML), Eric van der Vlist
• [offtopic] A message from the rebellion., Garland foster
• RE: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Doug Ransom
• RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML, Tim Bray
  • RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML, Joe English
    • RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML, Michael Kay
  • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des, John Cowan
  • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Tim Bray
  • RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Michael Fitzgerald
  • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, John Cowan
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Jeni Tennison
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-OrientedDescriptions for XML, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema,The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema,, John Cowan
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema,, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema,, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema,, John Cowan
      • English sentences, was: Re: Announce: XML Schema,, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: English sentences, was: Re: Announce: XML Schema,, John Cowan
      • Re: Re: English sentences, was: Re: Announce: XML Schema,, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Re: English sentences, was: Re: Announce: XML Schema,, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Re: English sentences, was: Re: Announce: XML Schema,, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Re: English sentences, was: Re: Announce: XML Schema,, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Re: English sentences, was: Re: Announce: XML Schema,, John Cowan
      • Re: English sentences, was: Re: Announce: XMLSchema,, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: English sentences, was: Re: Announce: XMLSchema,, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: English sentences, was: Re: Announce:XMLSchema,, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: English sentences,was: Re: Announce: XML Schema,, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: English sentences, was: Re: Announce:XML Schema,, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema,, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema,, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-OrientedDescriptions for XML, Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-OrientedDescriptions for XML, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Sean McGrath
    • Re: Announce: XML Schema,The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema,, John Cowan
      • Re: Announce: XML Schema,, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [ANN] RelaxNGCC Ver.1.0, Kohsuke Kawaguchi
• Java - XMLReader and SAX Filters, Filipe Correia
  • RE: Java - XMLReader and SAX Filters, Leigh Dodds
    • RE: Java - XMLReader and SAX Filters, Filipe Correia
• Objects vs. XML aka LISP and How History Repeats Itself, Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Sean McGrath
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Doug Ransom
  • RE: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Sean McGrath
• Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML, Eric van der Vlist
• help - Writing schema, pradeep bhat
  • Re: help - Writing schema, Jeni Tennison
• RE: Intuition and XML Schema restriction (was: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt), Jeff Lowery
• Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Sean McGrath
  • Representing interdependence of elements within a schema or dtd, John Rivett-Carnac
    • Re: Representing interdependence of elements within a schema or dtd, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Tim Bray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, McNally, David
  • RE: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Doug Ransom
• Namespace declaration using DOM, pradeep bhat
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Namespace declaration using DOM, pradeep bhat
    • Re: Namespace declaration using DOM, Christian Nentwich
      • Re: Namespace declaration using DOM, J.Pietschmann
      • Re: Namespace declaration using DOM, Uche Ogbuji
• RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Don Box
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, James Clark
    • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Paul Prescod
    • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, John Cowan
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Paul Prescod
    • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Don Box
    • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, W. E. Perry
    • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, John Cowan
    • RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Don Box
  • RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, John Cowan
    • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, W. E. Perry
  • RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, W. E. Perry
  • RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, W. E. Perry
  • RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?, Sean McGrath
• Updated on 6, ndw
  • Re: Updated on 6, Norman Walsh
• RE: on the subject of schema crunching..., Dare Obasanjo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: on the subject of schema crunching..., Paul Brown
• on the subject of schema crunching..., Paul Brown
  • Re: on the subject of schema crunching..., Rick Jelliffe
    • Second edition of XML in a Nutshell published, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Second edition of XML in a Nutshell published, Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: on the subject of schema crunching..., Francis Norton
• Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Rob Lugt
  • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Rob Lugt
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Rob Lugt
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier toauthor) XML, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Rob Lugt
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier toauthor) XML, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Paul Prescod
    • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Rob Lugt
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Tim Bray
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier, John Cowan
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Tim Bray
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Simon St.Laurent
      • Logical markup Language, Trevor Croll
      • Re: Logical markup Language, Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: Logical markup Language, Danny Ayers
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easiertoauthor) XML, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Rob Lugt
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, Steve Ball
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Paul Prescod
    • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML, J.Pietschmann
      • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML, Jeff Rafter
  • Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML), Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML), Jeff Rafter
      • Re: Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly lessverbose (andeasier to author) XML), Eric van der Vlist
• RE: RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Dare Obasanjo
• RE: stopping XML (was RE: Relax NG Projects), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Relax NG Projects, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Relax NG Projects, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Relax NG Projects, John Cowan
    • Re: Relax NG Projects, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Relax NG Projects, John Cowan
  • RE: Relax NG Projects, J. David Eisenberg
  • Re: Relax NG Projects, Rick Jelliffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Relax NG Projects, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • stopping XML (was RE: Relax NG Projects), Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Relax NG Projects, Steven Noels
      • [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects, Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects, Michael Kay
      • Re: [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects, Matt Gushee
      • RE: [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects, Michael Leditschke
      • Re: [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects, Steven Noels
      • Re: [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects, Thomas B. Passin
      • RE: [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects, Ramin Firoozye
      • [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects, james anderson
      • Re: [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: Relax NG Projects, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Relax NG Projects, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Relax NG Projects, J. David Eisenberg
  • Re: Relax NG Projects, walter kriha
• How to Unsubscribe, Bing.Li
• RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, John Cowan
  • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, John Cowan
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Mike Champion
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, John Cowan
      • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Michael Fitzgerald
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, John Cowan
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Murali Mani
      • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Michael Fitzgerald
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Kohsuke Kawaguchi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, John Cowan
  • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Brothers, Michael (IA)
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, John Cowan
    • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Michael Fitzgerald
    • xmlschemata.org (was: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt), Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, John Cowan
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Jason Diamond
  • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Kohsuke Kawaguchi
      • Re: Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, John Cowan
    • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, James Clark
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Jeni Tennison
      • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Eddie Robertsson
  • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Eddie Robertsson
  • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Jeff Lowery
    • XML Startkabel updates, xml startkabel
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Eddie Robertsson
• XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Rick Taylor
  • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, John Evdemon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, J. David Eisenberg
    • Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Kohsuke Kawaguchi
    • Re: RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, John Cowan
  • RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt, Dare Obasanjo
• RE: Relax Lexical vs XML Lexical structure, Dare Obasanjo
• Relax Lexical vs XML Lexical structure, Doug Ransom
  • Re: Relax Lexical vs XML Lexical structure, Paul Prescod
• RE: Parse Error - Invalid Character, Joshua Allen
• xvif: not for schemas only, Eric van der Vlist
• xvif: fallback mechanism, Eric van der Vlist
• (location.pathname.substring(0,6), robin
• Extreme Markup Languages Program Now Available...Join other XML-Dev participants in Montreal, Elledge, Marion
• Format Output, Nguyen La Yen Dung
• Ann: Xml Validation Interoperability Framework (xvif), Eric van der Vlist
  • Ann: Schemachine (a pipelined Xml validation framework), Rick Jelliffe
    • A high-speed non-validating parser, Matt Fausey
    • Re: Ann: Schemachine (a pipelined Xml validationframework), Eric van der Vlist
• SAX Question, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Xerces-C++ and std::string, Corey A. Spitzer
  • Re: SAX Question, John Cowan
  • Re: SAX Question, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: SAX Question, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: SAX Question, Rob Lugt
• RE: New presentation about XML Schema Datatypes, Jeff Lowery
• OASIS TC Call For Participation: Automotive Repair Information TC, Karl F. Best
• What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: Best Practice - beyond schema), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned?(WAS RE: [ xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema), Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: [ xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema), Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned?(WAS RE: [ xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema), Paul Prescod
  • Re: What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: Best Practice - beyond schema), Jonathan Borden
• OASIS TC Call For Participation: Management Protocol TC, Karl F. Best
• Software Integration Markup Language?, Gustaf Liljegren
  • RE: Software Integration Markup Language?, bryan
• ANNOUNCE: Stylus Studio 4.0 Now Available -- Free, Adam Abrevaya
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: Stylus Studio 4.0 Now Available -- Free, Danny Vint
• RE: XUL available application, examples, demo. development?, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • Re: XUL available application, examples, demo. development?, Trevor Croll
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XUL available application, examples, demo. development?, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
    • RE: XUL available application, examples, demo. development?, bryan
• Updated Unicode presentation from XML 2001, John Cowan
• New presentation about XML Schema Datatypes, John Cowan
  • RE: New presentation about XML Schema Datatypes, Michael Kay
• ANNOUNCE: RDF Gateway v0.9.5 Released, Derrish Repchick
• Parse Error - Invalid Character, Karl Stubsjoen
  • Re: Parse Error - Invalid Character, Dennis Sosnoski
    • RE: Parse Error - Invalid Character, Karl Stubsjoen
      • Re: Parse Error - Invalid Character, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: simple and easiest method to input data thro telephone, raghavendran
      • Re: simple and easiest method to input data thro telephone, Peter Davis
      • RE: Parse Error - Invalid Character, Karl Stubsjoen
      • Re: Parse Error - Invalid Character, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Parse Error - Invalid Character, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Parse Error - Invalid Character, Dennis Sosnoski
• OASIS announcement of edXML discussion list, Karl F. Best
• ANN: Python implementation of Regular Fragmentations and online demo, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: ANN: Python implementation of Regular Fragmentations and online demo, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Best Practice - beyond schema, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Francis Norton
    • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Best Practice - beyond schema, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Best Practice - beyond schema, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Best Practice - beyond schema, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Francis Norton
  • RE: Best Practice - beyond schema, Anderson, John
    • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: Best Practice - beyond schema, Anderson, John
    • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: Best Practice - beyond schema, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Francis Norton
  • RE: Best Practice - beyond schema, Anderson, John
    • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Henry S. Thompson
• Best Practice - beyond schema, Paul Spencer
  • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, John Cowan
  • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Paul Spencer
      • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Best Practice - beyond schema, Robin LaFontaine
  • [ANN] Update of Topologi Schematron Validator adds RELAX NG, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Arjun Ray
    • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility, kundan.upadhyay
• RE: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text, Manos Batsis
• Namespaces and DTDs - Why not use what we have?, Anderson, John
  • Re: Namespaces and DTDs - Why not use what we have?, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: User interface programming XUL?, Manos Batsis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: User interface programming XUL?, Manos Batsis
  • RE: User interface programming XUL?, SHARPE, Ian
  • RE: User interface programming XUL?, Manos Batsis
    • XUL available application, examples, demo. development?, Trevor Croll
      • RE: XUL available application, examples, demo. development?, bryan
  • RE: User interface programming XUL?, Micah Dubinko
• RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Julian Reschke
    • Re: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Mark Baker
      • RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Julian Reschke
• XML to DTD Converter, Mustafa Hilal Qureshi
  • Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Tim Bray
      • Re: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Tim Bray
      • Re: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Mike Brown
      • RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Julian Reschke
      • RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • RE: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs, Thomas B. Passin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML to DTD Converter, trasverso
• XUL Fool?, Don Park
  • User interface programming XUL?, Trevor Croll
    • RE: User interface programming XUL?, Don Park
      • Re: User interface programming XUL?, Matt Gushee
      • RE: User interface programming XUL?, Don Park
      • Re: User interface programming XUL?, Paul Prescod
• XML Documents Complexity, Mustafa Hilal Qureshi
  • RE: XML Documents Complexity, Jimmy Cerra
    • Re: XML Documents Complexity, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: Validate with schemas, DuCharme, Bob (LNG)
• [ANN] New SAX 2.0 Parser for C++, Rob Lugt
• RE: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace, John Cowan
  • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: usecases: namespace, Bob Hutchison
    • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use, John Cowan
• Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML 2002 Conference, Elledge, Marion
  • Re: Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML, John Cowan
    • Re: Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML, Lauren Wood
• Validate with schemas, Sergio
  • Re: Validate with schemas, Elena Litani
  • RE: Validate with schemas, Stan
    • Re: Validate with schemas, Jeffrey Lomas
• validation and typechecking, olivier.dameron
  • Re: validation and typechecking, Rick Jelliffe
• MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility, kundan.upadhyay
  • Re: MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility, Mike Champion
  • Re: MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility, Elena Litani
• RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, Eric Bohlman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• CLaRK System - an XML-based System for Corpora Development, Milen Kouylekov
• dtd, schema vs RDF, olivier.dameron
• Lightning Talks at Open Source Conference, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: XML Conformance Test Suite at W3C, Dare Obasanjo
• RE: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• <xsd:all> problem, PeterHowells
  • Re: <xsd:all> problem, John Cowan
  • RE: <xsd:all> problem, Bill de hÓra
• Error in a Class Cast, João Sarraipa
  • RE: Error in a Class Cast, Patrick Lehti
• RE: Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back, Dare Obasanjo
• Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back, Tim Bray
  • RE: Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back, Don Park
    • RE: Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back, Leigh Dodds
    • Re: Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back, Arjun Ray
• RE: So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ..., Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ..., Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab le and You Mig ht As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Mig ht As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Anderson, John
• call for presentations, Paul Hermans
• RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Joshua Allen
    • RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Manos Batsis
  • RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Joshua Allen
    • Re: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitableand You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Mike Champion
  • RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: When do tags stop being a good idea?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: When do tags stop being a good idea?, Manos Batsis
  • Re: When do tags stop being a good idea?, Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre
• Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• When do tags stop being a good idea?, Bob Hutchison
  • Re: When do tags stop being a good idea?, bob mcwhirter
  • Re: When do tags stop being a good idea?, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: When do tags stop being a good idea?, Marcus Carr
    • XML Conformance Test Suite at W3C, Jeff Rafter
• Best Mailing List for Web Services?, Kakade Mangesh
• RE: RealSystem ML File, Kakade Mangesh
• [off-topic] For-pay APIs, Ramin Firoozye
• Re: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Henry S. Thompson
• RE: dates (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Allen, David J.
• Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, G. Ken Holman
    • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
    • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Marcus Carr
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • RE: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Michael Fitzgerald
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, G. Ken Holman
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
    • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Ronald Bourret
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, K. Ari Krupnikov
    • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, K. Ari Krupnikov
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
    • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, james anderson
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Norman Walsh
    • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Bob Hutchison
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, james anderson
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Michael Fuller
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Jonathan Borden
  • DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
    • Re: [dsdl-comment] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, John Cowan
      • Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
      • DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, james anderson
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, John Cowan
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Arjun Ray
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, John Cowan
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Arjun Ray
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, G. Ken Holman
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not neededas part of DTD syntax?, Dennis Sosnoski
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Rick Jelliffe
      • Why validate? What kind of validation?, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not neededas part of DTD syntax?, Dennis Sosnoski
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed, John Cowan
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed, Dennis Sosnoski
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed, John Cowan
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Arjun Ray
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, james anderson
      • Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part, John Cowan
      • Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part, james anderson
      • Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations, John Cowan
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Arjun Ray
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, John Cowan
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Arjun Ray
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, John Cowan
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Arjun Ray
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?, John Cowan
      • Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, John Cowan
      • Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
      • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
      • Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, John Cowan
    • Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
      • Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
      • Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, Ronald Bourret
      • RE: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, Michael Kay
      • Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
      • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, David Carlisle
      • Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
      • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, David Carlisle
      • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
      • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, David Carlisle
      • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
      • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, David Carlisle
      • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, Tim Bray
      • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL:use cases: namespace declaration notation, Thomas B. Passin
      • RE: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, Michael Kay
      • Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
      • Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, james anderson
      • Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation, Ronald Bourret
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Arjun Ray
    • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
    • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Marcus Carr
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Marcus Carr
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Marcus Carr
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Eric Bohlman
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Marcus Carr
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9, John Cowan
• RealSystem ML File, jjc
• RE: Pretty good interview with GM CTO Scott, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Data binding as type definition, Amelia A Lewis
  • Re: Data binding as type definition, John Cowan
    • Re: Data binding as type definition, Amelia A Lewis
      • New datatyping (was Re: Data binding as type definition), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Data binding as type definition, John Cowan
      • Re: Data binding as type definition, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Data binding as type definition, John Cowan
      • Re: Data binding as type definition, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Data binding as type definition, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: Data binding as type definition, John Cowan
      • Re: Data binding as type definition, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Data binding as type definition, John Cowan
      • Re: Data binding as type definition, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Data binding as type definition, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Data binding as type definition, Aaron Skonnard
      • RE: Data binding as type definition, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Data binding as type definition, Eric Bohlman
    • RE: Data binding as type definition, bryan
• publish vxml @ xml, Haszeli
• RE: XML syntax for XPath, Manos Batsis
  • Re: XML syntax for XPath, K. Ari Krupnikov
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML syntax for XPath, Wayne Steele
    • Re: XML syntax for XPath, lakshmi
      • How to unsubscribe (was Re: something else), Mike Brown
• How to change structure for XML file?, Nguyen La Yen Dung
  • Re: How to change structure for XML file?, Matt Gushee
• Pretty good interview with GM CTO Scott, Tim Bray
• RE: Xml/xpath/xslt, Adam Chang
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Xml/xpath/xslt, Dare Obasanjo
• ANN: update to XSLToolbox, Josh Lubell
• RE: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, peej
  • RE: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Xan Gregg
    • Re: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, P.J. Schwartz
• (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc, peej
• remembering Orlando, Simon St.Laurent
• Re: xml-dev Digest 10 Jun 2002 15:30:40 -0000 Issue 339, VendrEDI
• XML syntax for XPath, K. Ari Krupnikov
  • RE: XML syntax for XPath, Michael Kay
  • Re: XML syntax for XPath, Michael Dyck
• RE: experts (RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, saysDon Box), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: experts (RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: experts (RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Aaron Skonnard
• Re: Borrowed email address for virus, monty solomon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Borrowed email address for virus, Kakade Mangesh
• Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Rob Lugt
• How to find out the name of the tag where my xmldocument did not validate, Peter Magnusson
• Formatting XML, Sebastian A.
  • RE: Formatting XML, Michael Kay
    • RE: Formatting XML, Mike Champion
  • Re: Formatting XML, robert
• RE: embedding xml schema in an instance doc, Dare Obasanjo
• embedding xml schema in an instance doc, peej
  • XMLSerializer, Mohamed Raffi
• New version of XSV up on the web, somewhat experimental, Henry S. Thompson
• Evangelizing RNG, Don Park
  • Re: Evangelizing RNG, Norman Gray
• Xml/xpath/xslt, Adam Chang
  • Re: Xml/xpath/xslt, Mike Brown
  • Re: Xml/xpath/xslt, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: Xml/xpath/xslt, bob mcwhirter
• RE: xsi:type and broken contracts, Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Jeff Rafter
  • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Paul Prescod
      • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Paul Prescod
      • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Paul Prescod
      • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: xsi:type and broken contracts, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: xsi:type and broken contracts, Michael Leditschke
  • RE: xsi:type and broken contracts, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: xsi:type and broken contracts, Michael Leditschke
  • RE: xsi:type and broken contracts, Dare Obasanjo
• xsi:type and broken contracts, Amelia A Lewis
  • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Jeff Rafter
  • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Jeni Tennison
  • Re: xsi:type and broken contracts, Henry S. Thompson
• Are there any tools that do some DTD introspection?, Daniel Shane
  • Re: Are there any tools that do some DTD introspection?, Mike Champion
  • Re: Are there any tools that do some DTD introspection?, Rob Lugt
• RE: XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Dare Obasanjo
• RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Mike Champion
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Rich Salz
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Rick Jelliffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Rich Salz
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Mike Champion
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Rich Salz
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, bryan
      • Actually, resistance is proving far from futile, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: Actually, resistance is proving far from futile, Rich Salz
      • Re: Actually, resistance is proving far from futile, Rich Salz
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Matt Gushee
      • Re: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Mike Champion
      • RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Jim Ancona
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Rich Salz
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Rich Salz
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John F Schlesinger
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Michael Kay
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bill de hÓra
      • SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Mike Champion
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Alaric B. Snell
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Mike Champion
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Mike Champion
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Mike Champion
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Matt Gushee
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Paul Prescod
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Paul Prescod
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Tim Bray
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Paul Prescod
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Alaric Snell
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Paul Prescod
      • RE: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Mark Baker
      • Re: SOAP, XSD, and HTTP, Mike Champion
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bill de hÓra
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bill de hÓra
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Rich Salz
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Joe English
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Mike Champion
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Joe English
      • RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Michael Kay
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Alaric Snell
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Tim Bray
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, David Carlisle
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bill de hÓra
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Fredrik Lindgren
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bill de hÓra
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Tim Bray
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Mike Champion
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • experts (RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: experts (RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, saysDon Box), W. E. Perry
      • Re: experts (RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, saysDon Box), Paul Prescod
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Matt Gushee
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Amelia A Lewis
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Tim Bray
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Arjun Ray
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Jason Diamond
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, James Clark
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Jason Diamond
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Amelia A Lewis
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Jason Diamond
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Amelia A Lewis
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Arjun Ray
    • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Michael Kay
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Eddie Robertsson
      • Keys versus links (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, bryan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Thomas B. Passin
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, bryan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Matt Gushee
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, bryan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Francis Norton
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Matt Gushee
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Matt Gushee
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, bryan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Francis Norton
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, bryan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Mike Champion
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Mike Champion
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Matt Gushee
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, W. E. Perry
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, W. E. Perry
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • dates (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: dates (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile,, John Cowan
      • Re: dates (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance isFutile, says Don Box), J.Pietschmann
      • Re: dates (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Jeff Greif
      • Re: dates (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: dates (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, W. E. Perry
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, W. E. Perry
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, W. E. Perry
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Michael Kay
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Eric Bohlman
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Michael Kay
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, James Clark
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, W. E. Perry
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, W. E. Perry
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bill de hÓra
      • Message not available
      • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon Fell
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Mark Seaborne
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, bryan
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
  • RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Matt Gushee
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, W. E. Perry
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ..., Mike Champion
      • Re: So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ..., John Cowan
      • Re: So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ..., Mike Champion
      • Re: So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ..., Francis Norton
• Borrowed email address for virus, G. Ken Holman
  • Re: Borrowed email address for virus, John Cowan
• XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Manos Batsis
  • Re: XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Uche Ogbuji
• W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Mike Champion
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Henry S. Thompson
      • Constitutionally incapable (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Constitutionally incapable (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Constitutionally incapable (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Constitutionally incapable (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Constitutionally incapable (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), John Cowan
      • Re: Constitutionally incapable (was Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box), MURATA Makoto
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
      • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Paul Prescod
    • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Murali Mani
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, John Cowan
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box, Seairth Jacobs
• RE: XML-Development questions (WAS: RE: How to declare a int variable in XSL), Long, Craig Z
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML-Development questions (WAS: RE: How to declare a int variable in XSL), Manos Batsis
• XML-Development questions (WAS: RE: How to declare a int variable in XSL), Manos Batsis
• RE: How to declare a int variable in XSL, Manos Batsis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: How to declare a int variable in XSL, Manos Batsis
    • Re: How to declare a int variable in XSL, Thomas B. Passin
• How to declare a int variable in XSL, Mohamed Raffi
  • Re: How to declare a int variable in XSL, David Carlisle
    • Re: How to declare a int variable in XSL, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: How to declare a int variable in XSL, David Carlisle
• SourceForge and Zvon RFC Repository, Miloslav Nic
  • Re: SourceForge and Zvon RFC Repository, Rich Salz
• RE: Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer, Alex Brown
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer, Manos Batsis
• Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer, gkholman
• schemas, communities, Simon St.Laurent
  • Strategies for editing large documents, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: Strategies for editing large documents, Thomas B. Passin
• XForms processors generalized API [proposal], Peter V. Mikhalenko
• RE: RELAX NG-related tools (was: Interesting mailing li st ...), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: RELAX NG-related tools (was: Interesting mailing list ...), DuCharme, Bob (LNG)
  • RE: RELAX NG-related tools (was: Interesting mailing li st ...), John Evdemon
    • RE: RELAX NG-related tools (was: Interesting mailing list ...), Murali Mani
• ANN: Persian - C++ Web Services Platform, David Noor
• schema management for a document pipeline: request for comment, DuCharme, Bob (LNG)
  • Re: schema management for a document pipeline: request for comment, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: schema management for a document pipeline: request for comment, Eddie Robertsson
  • Re: schema management for a document pipeline: requestfor comment, Robin LaFontaine
• Deadline for XML 2002 Call for Papers, June 15th, Elledge, Marion
• Is there any way for converting word perfect files .wpd to xml files?????, SysGrad
  • Re: Is there any way for converting word perfect files .wpdto xml fi les?????, Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: Is there any way for converting word perfect files .wpd to xml fi les?????, K. Ari Krupnikov
      • Re: Is there any way for converting word perfect files.wpd to xml fi les?????, Betty Harvey
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Castor 0.9.3.19 has been released, Arnaud Blandin
• RE: doc2xml, Manos Batsis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: doc2xml, Manos Batsis
• doc2xml, Alexey N. Shananin
  • RE: doc2xml, Steven Noels
• [ANN] Lucid XML Editor - version 1.0a1, Lucid'i.t. annonce
• Parsing XML & JSP problems, Meichun Li
  • Re: Parsing XML & JSP problems, Ronald Bourret
  • Re: Parsing XML & JSP problems, Ronald Bourret
• RE: Why datatypes?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Why datatypes?, Murali Mani
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Why datatypes?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Why datatypes?, Michael Kay
    • RE: Why datatypes?, Murali Mani
      • Re: Why datatypes?, Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: Why datatypes?, Rick Jelliffe
  • FW: Why datatypes?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Why datatypes?, Gustaf Liljegren
  • Re: Why datatypes?, Henry S. Thompson
  • Re: Why datatypes?, Arjun Ray
  • Re: Why datatypes?, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Why datatypes?, Arjun Ray
      • Building Complex XML, Nischal Muthana
      • RE: Building Complex XML, Michael Kay
      • RE: Building Complex XML, Nischal Muthana
      • RE: Building Complex XML, Michael Kay
      • Re: RE: Building Complex XML, Eric Bohlman
      • Re: Why datatypes?, Eric Bohlman
• Re: [Sax-devel] Consensus? expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements, Rob Lugt
• RE: XML Schema considered harmful?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Tool to translate from one schema to another, Martin Tapp
• RE: Namespace problem, Manos Batsis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Namespace problem, Anderson, John
• Namespace problem, pradeep bhat
  • RE: Namespace problem, Michael Kay
  • Re: Namespace problem, Jeff Greif
    • Re: Namespace problem, John Cowan
• Just say NO to XSD, Don Park
  • Re: Just say NO to XSD, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: Just say NO to XSD, Mike Champion
• Zvon personal opinion on XML Schema, Miloslav Nic
• RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Elena Litani
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, James Clark
    • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, bryan
  • Re: RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Mike Champion
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Eddie Robertsson
    • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, James Clark
      • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Cyril Jandia
    • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Mike Champion
      • RELAX NG-related tools (was: Interesting mailing list ...), John Cowan
      • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Mike Champion
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, TAN Kuan Hui
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, John Cowan
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Anderson, John
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, John Cowan
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, James Clark
      • Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Miles Sabin
      • RE: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list& a rare broadside), Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Miles Sabin
      • RE: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Michael Kay
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Henrik Motakef
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Rob Lugt
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Rob Lugt
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Rob Lugt
      • RE: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Michael Kay
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list& a rare broadside), Francis Norton
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Jim Ancona
      • Re: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Malicious documents?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Michael Leditschke
      • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Paul Prescod
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Michael Leditschke
      • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, James Clark
      • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, James Clark
      • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, W. E. Perry
  • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Dare Obasanjo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Hutchison, Nigel
  • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, John Cowan
  • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Hutchison, Nigel
  • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Paul Prescod
      • sharing dom on Virtual machines, lakshmi
      • Re: sharing dom on Virtual machines, lakshmi
      • Re: sharing dom on Virtual machines, Peter V. Mikhalenko
      • JMS OR SOAP, lakshmi
      • Re: JMS OR SOAP, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Paul Prescod
      • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Uche Ogbuji
      • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Paul Prescod
      • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Uche Ogbuji
• Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Tim Bray
  • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Bill de hÓra
    • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Roger L. Costello
      • RE: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?, Thomas B. Passin
• Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Tim Bray
  • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Don Park
  • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Murali Mani
    • Re: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside, Joe English
  • XML Schema considered harmful?, Michael Leditschke
    • Re: XML Schema considered harmful?, Eddie Robertsson
    • Re: XML Schema considered harmful?, Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: XML Schema considered harmful?, Michael Leditschke
      • Re: XML Schema considered harmful?, Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: XML Schema considered harmful?, Cyril Jandia
      • Re: XML Schema considered harmful?, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: XML Schema considered harmful?, Murali Mani
      • Re: XML Schema considered harmful?, John Cowan
    • Re: XML Schema considered harmful?, Murali Mani
    • Re: XML Schema considered harmful?, James Clark
    • Re: XML Schema considered harmful?, John Cowan
• CONTENT AGGREGATION USING TOPIC MAPS, Elledge, Marion
• ESPX/TinyXSL call for help (XML/ECMAScript hackers most wanted, then ;=), Cyril Jandia
• xml-dev archives missing posts from end of April, Mike Brown
• [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 1.1.9 available, George Cristian Bina
• RE: The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap!, Rich Salz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [ANN] Lucid XML Toolkit - v1.0 alpha 3, Lucid'i.t. annonce
• Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified, Richard Tobin
• RE: Question regarding PSVI.., Murali Mani
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Question regarding PSVI.., Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Question regarding PSVI.., Murali Mani
• Proposal (was Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements), Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Proposal (was Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected localname for non-namespace qualified elements), Ronald Bourret
    • Re: Proposal (was Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected localname for non-namespace qualified elements), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Proposal (was Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey:expected localname for non-namespace qualified elements), Ronald Bourret
• RE: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: RE: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements, Ronald Bourret
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements, Rob Lugt
  • Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements, Rob Lugt
• Re: The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap!, Paul Prescod
  • Re: The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap!, Rich Salz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap!, Anderson, John
• Re: The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back!It's a trap!, Paul Prescod
• More Patent Follies?, Mike Champion
  • Re: More Patent Follies?, Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • Re: More Patent Follies?, Thomas B. Passin
• Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements, Simon St.Laurent
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements, Rob Lugt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements, Robin Berjon
    • Consensus? expected local name for non-namespace qualifiedelements, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Consensus? expected local name for non-namespacequalified elements, Thomas B. Passin
• W3C XML Schema errata updated, also schema document for schemas, Henry S. Thompson
• Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name fornon-namespace qualified elements, Simon St.Laurent
• XML Standards Library 1.0 : Updated 1 June 2002, MWS Tech Support
• Re: Visualizing data - www.kartoo.com, John Evdemon