[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Schema at XML namespace URI to change

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: ht@c..., Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 08:01:40 -0500

This is confusing.  The problem of mime types 
for the metalanguage has been discussed for 
a long time now, even when XML itself was 
being specified and prior to that when 
it was proposed that SGML application 
languages be specified as notations.  What 
issues have held up work in this area?

Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h

From: ht@c... [mailto:ht@c...]

You're absolutely right that as it stands text/xml is much too blunt
an instrument.  I believe Makoto and others are labouring with the
IETF to make it so more detail can be specified.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: I'm new developer in XML-Java
• Next by Date: RE: Soft Landing
• Previous by thread: RE: Schema at XML namespace URI to change
• Next by thread: Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread