[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms
At 06:47 PM 10/26/00 -0400, Jonathan Borden wrote: >I read the proposed 'solution' to the problem of XHTML etc links and >compatibility with XLink (http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink-naming/). > >XHTML 1.0 is specified via DTDs as is XHTML 1.1. XLink needs to support this >W3C recommendation in its current form. Architectural Forms would be a >fairly straightforward way to solve this problem (and perhaps one of the >best use cases for AF I've seen -- IMHO). I think that's a lot of what was intended in the early drafts of XLink: http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/WD-xlink-19980303#remapping When the attribute remapping was dropped in favor of namespaces, new kinds of conflicts emerged. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|