Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
 Blow
off the syntactic web or enumerate the syntaxes. There are many.
Good luck.
If by
this you mean, solidify the XML application vocabularies, go for
it.
The
Semantic Web is a crock. You can't explain and neither can
Berners-Lee. It
is the
kind of requirement that leads to the noisy specs everyone is protesting.
If a
requirement can't be described in prose most of us can agree to, it is a
bogus requirement
and
should be banned from future discussion.
Web
services can be precisely enumerated such that even machines can figure
out
which service is which. As to whether what they find and provide is what
was
asked for, humans determine that nicely when they orchestrate
services.
Actually, some architectures are in place, are precisely described and
are
being
implemented. .net is one. Because of that, we can build with it, for
it,
and
interoperate with it. No W3C required other than to not put cruft into
the
base specifications such as XML syntax.
Semantic web my behind. I just want to order a pizza, not have
mozarella
explained to me. Len
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
