[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?

• From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:51:02 +1000

At 06:51 17/10/2000, Jonathan.Robie@S... wrote:

>Bullard, Claude L wrote:
>
> > The Semantic Web is a crock.  You can't explain and
> > neither can Berners-Lee.
>
>Unlike Tim, I do not claim to know whether the semantic web can pan out or 
>not. However, if the W3C is to be a research lab for the web, it has to be 
>free to try some things that are not proven technology.

Who said the W3C is a "research lab"?
I thought it was a source of "standards"?

J

-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@s...

• References:
  • RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
    • From: Jonathan.Robie@S...

• Prev by Date: RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
• Next by Date: RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
• Previous by thread: RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
• Next by thread: RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread