[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change
At 08:52 AM 23/10/00 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote: >Content negotiation! There's actually literally nothing at the >namespace URI, and the server is set up to return whats at >..../namespace.html if the http GET is for text/html, and to return >the ..../namespace.xsd if it's text/xml. Ouch... the schema WG really ought to get around to proposing a +xml media-type for .xsd, and use that... I appreciate that there is no malice involved, but this smells like a land grab. Hm... I also wonder if text/ is the right top-level type; some would argue that xsd is not human-readable enough & thus application/ is more appropriate. And some might argue that the list of top-level media types { application, audio, image, message, model, multipart, text, video } could use a new addition, "schema". Probably not me though. Er... I just fetched that with IE5.5, which *does* accept XML, and I got the HTML version. Hmm, have to look at the IE accept headers. I've always had crappy luck with content negotiation, but lots of smart people think it's important, so I guess the jury's out. Anyhow, I think that Rick is right, that an 80/20 solution here, file extension and/or content-negotiation, is perfectly OK for the short term and might turn out to be embarrassingly OK in the long term, just like that other famous 80/20 solution, the WWW. -T
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|