[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO

• From: KenNorth <KenNorth@e...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 19:49:32 -0700

Ken North writes:
>  > Is that really a negligible benefit?

David Megginson writes:
> Pretty much, at least in the current economy.

COBOL and FORTRAN have been with us for decades. Even SQL and SGML span
multiple economic cycles. XML is likely to be with us for a long time, so we
shouldn't base our decisions on current economic behavior.

• References:
  • Re: RELAX to ISO
    • From: Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@y...>
  • Re: RELAX to ISO
    • From: KenNorth <KenNorth@e...>
  • Re: RELAX to ISO
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: RELAX to ISO
    • From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>
  • Re: RELAX to ISO
    • From: KenNorth <KenNorth@e...>
  • (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO
    • From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>
  • re: (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO
    • From: KenNorth <KenNorth@e...>
  • Re: (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Grouping
• Next by Date: Re: Cocoon
• Previous by thread: Re: (XML is SGML, part 1,002) Re: RELAX to ISO
• Next by thread: Re: RELAX to ISO
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread