|
top
|
Subject: EDI Specs Not Complete Author: Tony Lavinio Date: 05 Apr 2006 08:28 PM
|
> Why not just add these attributes to the Numeric derived type?
Adding them won't help; minLength and maxLength are ignored by
xml schema validators for xsd:decimal.
> I also noticed that the enumeration for the GS08 element does not
> allow for UCS, VICS, etc. Will that be added in the future?
What would you like to see? How would you like to see UCS, VICS,
or something else handled?
We've currently implemented only the X12 specifications that come from
DISA and are part of the base spec. The problem is that for many of
the standards, you must purchase the standard and/or become a member of
the associated organization, and that requires a business case.
Currently, we support EDIFACT, IATA and X12. We allow you to extend
the schema, and turn off the portion of validation that would keep
you from using your changes, so that we don't force you to use just
what we've implemented inside of the product. For example, see
http://www.stylusstudio.com/docs/v2006/d_flatfileconversion39.html
|
|
|
|