|
top
|
 Subject: Re: XHTML v.1.1 Author: (Deleted User) Date: 26 Apr 2002 05:18 PM
|
At 16.18 26/04/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>From: "Yitzhak Khabinsky"
>
>This is a sequel to my previous posting.
>I'm trying to create a XHTML document conformant with XHTML v.1.1.
>So I am using DOCTYPE declaration in the document based on the W3C URL:
>http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/conformance.html#s_conform
>
>Even my XHTML document is taken from the same W3C URL.
>
>When I click on 'Indent XML tags' button Stylus Studio gives me an error
>message:
>Expected an element name.
>
>My Stylus version is 4.0 Beta, build 083c.
Hi Yitzhak,
first of all I must say that I am not familiar with the XHTML 1.1 spec, so
forgive me if I say something wrong....
When I try to indent this sample fragment (taken from the specs)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" >
<head>
<title>Virtual Library</title>
</head>
<body>
<p>Moved to <a href="http://vlib.org/">vlib.org</a>.</p>
</body>
</html>
I get the error "Expected an element name" inside the XHTML DTD, at this
statement
<!ELEMENT %span.qname; %span.content; >
where span.content is defined as
<!ENTITY % span.content
"( #PCDATA | %Inline.mix; )*"
The problem is that Inline.mix has not been defined, so the parser is given
a statement (after entity expansion) <!ELEMENT span (#PCDATA | )> that
is invalid (hence the error message "Expected an element name").
By navigating through the structure of DTD and MOD file, I found that the
Inline.mix entity should be declared in the xhtml11-model-1.mod file, that,
being included from the
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/DTD/xhtml-framework-1.mod file,
should be located at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/DTD/xhtml11-model-1.mod but...
its location on the server is
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11-model-1.mod
In my humble opinion, either someone screwed up the location of the file on
the server (why should a .mod file not be in the xhtml-modularization
directory?) or there is an error in the XHTML 1.1 DTD (fixed by using the
absolute URL instead of "xhtml11-model-1.mod"); in any case, the only
suggestion I can give you is to point to the "flat" version of the DTD, by
changing the DOCTYPE declaration into <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD
XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11-flat.dtd">
Hope this helps,
Alberto
|
|
|