[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Is this the best way to compute a sigmoid functi

Subject: Re: Is this the best way to compute a sigmoid function?
From: "John Lumley john.lumley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 20:53:11 -0000
Re:    Is this the best way to compute a sigmoid functi
o;?Apart from determining the value of G or the fine constant, or a few other
esoteric determination of funadamental constants, what practical issues
require more than 7-8 significant figures of precision?

Yes, some interplanetary differentials might at times. (Our moon recedes from
us as fast as your fingernails grow, and GPS internals can need sub-nanosecond
differential time intervals) but what ones we might encounter in the XML
world.

o;?The bfetishb of chasing decimal places in most, but not all, cases
shows a lack of understanding of the essence of the problem.

The (artificial) epitome of this is the well-trodden problem of a railway
around the world that must be lifted up 1 cm, but stays circular... how much
more rail is needed?
bWhere angels fear to treadb rush in with finding the difference by
 2*pi*6,357,000.01 - 2*pi*6,357,000
which requires 9-10 places of numerical precision (i.e. approaching 30 bits of
mantissa) neglecting the deeper structure of the mathematics..

John Lumley
john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>> On 2 May 2020, at 19:09, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> o;?
>
>> On 2 May 2020, at 18:55, Costello, Roger L. costello@xxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I want to compute the result of evaluating this sigmoid function:
>>
>>     1
>> ----------------
>> (1 + e**-x)
>>
>> That is, compute 1 divided by (1 + e raised to the -x power)
>
> In recent versions of XPath, you can simply do
>
> (1 div (1 + math:exp(-$x)))
>
>> (However, it already appears to be mighty accurate -- look at all those
digits to the right of the decimal point)
>
> I hope you don't seriously believe that precision implies accuracy - that
someone who claims the population of the world is 7,345,651,523 is more likely
to be right than someone who says it is 7 billion.
>
>> Notice that for the variable $e-to-the-minus-x-power I specified it this
way: as="xs:decimal". Should I have specified it this way: as="xs:float"
instead?
>
> For calculations like this it's best to use xs:double. You don't need any
more precision than this, and exponential/trigonometric functions are likely
to be implemented as double-precision floating point by whatever underlying
library is used.
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica
> XSL-List info and archive
> EasyUnsubscribe (by email)

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.