[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: In XSLT 3.0, should the "document" function be av
Looks pretty clear it's a bug. I also spotted recently that Saxon's xsl:evaluate allows you to call stylesheet functions that are (explicitly or implicitly) private. We'll only catch these things if people notice them and report them. Michael Kay Saxonica > On 16 Jan 2017, at 15:04, Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 16.01.2017 15:55, Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Have you also tried the XPath function doc() ? > > Yes, using 'doc' instead of 'document' all three implementations return the same result, namely two times the stylesheet code. But I am not so much looking for a solution to get some code working but I am rather trying to understand why Saxon or XMLSpy make 'document' available in xsl:evaluate, given that the spec seems to exclude XSLT only functions.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|