|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Rexsel — A simpler way of writing XSLT
Slip of the memory I fear b wonbt see the right side of 75 years again :-) I started with OmniMark (and SGML, but that is another story) before XSLT arrived and used that for some years finally going over to XSLT. Main reason being the cost of the former after they withdrew a free version. Irritating because OmniMark could process free text, not just tagged text such as XML. Hugh > On 30 Jun 2024, at 12:23, Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> Hi >> >> I have been working with XSLT/XML for sometime >> now (>25 years) > > XSL Transformations (XSLT) > Version 1.0 > > W3C Recommendation 16 November 1999 > > Difficult. > > regards > > > > -- > Dave Pawson > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > Docbook FAQ.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








