|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Rexsel — A simpler way of writing XSLT
On 30/06/2024 14:22, Hugh Field-Richards hsfr@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Clearly I should have done some more homework on this, sighb& I'm speaking in ignorance of other editors here, as I've been using Emacs with xslide-mode for two decades, and it both colourises and indents XSLT pretty well, as well as the usual auto-complete. I had always assumed other editors did much the same. But I take the point that once you get your head round the XSLT syntax it is not a problem, The problem is not [us] XML-heads: most of us have pointy brackets growing out of our ears. The target is programmers of languages which use nested indented curly-brace syntax where everything is an argument to everything else and where you begin by declaring your entire program to be null and void, who expect all other languages to be the same. For that demographic, both XMQ and REXSEL may be useful tools. Alternate syntaxes are always being invented, both as programming languages and as markup languages. They keep us looking young and beautiful. The only one I have personally found to be of use in recent years has been Relax NG compact syntax, simply because life is too short to use W3C Schemas. Peter
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








