|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: My XPath mistakenly referenced an element that do
> > Even adding req() as a synonym for one-or-more() might be enough to encourage people to write req(Document)/req(foo) in order to get better diagnostics. > > Why not just: > > req(Document/foo) > The finer-grained form would enable more precise diagnostics. And they aren't equivalent: if there are two Document elements, only one of which has a foo child, one expression would fail and the other would succeed. Michael Kay Saxonica
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








