Re: An observation on the performance of fn:transform

Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
writes:
> We currently honour cache="yes" in all cases provided that no static
> parameters are supplied. If there are static parameters, we don't
> attempt to check that they are consistent with previous uses, we just
> bypass the cache.

Ah. That explains why it had no effect. Ibm passing two static
parameters. One I could eliminate, but the other is a debug flag and I
think it would be unfortunate to lose that one.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norman Tovey-Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx>
https://nwalsh.com/

> Klein bottle for rent; enquire within.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]