[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Performance results of an XML-based neural network

Subject: Re: Performance results of an XML-based neural network versus a map-based neural network
From: "Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 12:17:19 -0000
Re:  Performance results of an XML-based neural network
On 22.07.2020 13:25, Dr. Roger L Costello costello@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Surprisingly, however, the overall time to train the XML-based neural
network was faster than the time to train the map-based neural network:

neural-network:train


XML-based:
average time (net/ms) = 1711.572
total time (net/ms) = 169,445.644

map-based:
average time (net/ms) = 3633.811
total time (net/ms) = 359,747.295

I don't understand how this could possibly happen.


Does the profile not reveal where the map based solution spends most of
the time?


Which Saxon version exactly is that?


It might matter to judge that if the internal implementation of maps in
Saxon has changed in different versions.

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.