Re: In XSLT 3.0, should the "document" function be av

Play the video

Subject: Re: In XSLT 3.0, should the "document" function be available in xsl:evaluate?
From: "Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:03:42 -0000

On 16.01.2017 15:55, Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Have you also tried the XPath function doc() ?

Yes, using 'doc' instead of 'document' all three implementations return the same result, namely two times the stylesheet code. But I am not so much looking for a solution to get some code working but I am rather trying to understand why Saxon or XMLSpy make 'document' available in xsl:evaluate, given that the spec seems to exclude XSLT only functions.

Current Thread
In XSLT 3.0, should the "document" function be available in xsl:evaluate? Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx - 16 Jan 2017 14:35:34 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx - 16 Jan 2017 14:55:31 -0000 Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx - 16 Jan 2017 15:03:42 -0000 <= Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx - 16 Jan 2017 19:04:04 -0000 Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx - 16 Jan 2017 19:40:34 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: In XSLT 3.0, should the ", Dimitre Novatchev dn	Thread	Re: In XSLT 3.0, should the ", Michael Kay mike@xxx
Re: In XSLT 3.0, should the ", Dimitre Novatchev dn	Date	Re: In XSLT 3.0, should the ", Michael Kay mike@xxx
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >