[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xsl-fo and professional publishing

Subject: Re: xsl-fo and professional publishing
From: "Eliot Kimber ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 21:06:24 -0000
Re:  xsl-fo and professional publishing
I'm happy to be proven wrong on my no-FO-in-publishing assertion--mine is
based on what I've seen in my Publishing clients, but then I have those
clients largely because they don't already have a good XML solution, so
there's very likely some selection bias there.

Liam: are you able to disclose who any of these larger publishers are? I
don't doubt your assertion, just curious who they are.

It does make sense that for fiction, in particular, it would be entirely
realistic to use XSL-FO and some relatively simple parameterization of
details like page geometry, fonts, and chapter opener decoration to
produce good-quality books.

Cheers,

E.
bbbbb
Eliot Kimber, Owner
Contrext, LLC
http://contrext.com




On 6/13/14, 3:48 PM, "Liam R E Quin liam@xxxxxx"
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 13:10 +0000, jfrm.maurel@xxxxxxxxx
>jfrm.maurel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder whether xml + xsl + xsl-fo is a current practise in
>> professional publishing for technical books at least in Europe.
>
>To give a counterpoint to Eliot's response, XSL-FO is very, very widely
>used in professional publishing; the largest publishers use XSL-FO (and
>in some cases XHTML + CSS) for most of their fiction and mainstream
>texts.
>
>There are relatively few publishers using it, but between them they
>produce most of the books you see - although there's much more diversity
>in Europe than in the USA in that regard.
>
>The reasons are (1) they need to produce lots of books that look
>similar; (2) they need to produce ebooks in XHTML, not just PDF (e.g.
>for Kindle); (3) they need to minimise hand-work.
>
>Viable alternatives for a single book include Scribus (open source),
>XHTML + CSS (but the formatters that are good enough are expensive and
>for technical work there are severe limitations; however, that's what
>O'Reilly is now doing), Adobe InDesign or Framemaker, and many other
>tools. It's *possible* to use MS Word, but you need a lot of discipline,
>and at the end of the process making an ebook will be a pain although
>there are products to help.
>
>There's even at least one course taught on using XSL-FO for publishers,
>at the Stuttgart media centre.
>
>Liam
>
>--
>Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
>Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
>Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.