Re: Things that make you go Hmmmm!

On 29 March 2014 12:42, Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> I was surprised that the content models of xsl:copy and xsl:copy-of
>>>>> were different (by dint of the select attribute) in the first place.
>>>>
>>>> They are still different, no? shallow vs deep.
>>
>> On 28 March 2014 17:50, Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure what point you are making.
>>
>> That the content models are still different (not just the select attribute).
>>
>
> The only other difference I see is that xsl:copy has a
> use-attribute-set attribute and the xsl:copy-of  doesn't.
>
> I'd make them the same.

So if you made them the same, I'm guessing you would allow children in
xsl:copy-of rather than make xsl:copy empty - is that right?  If so,
what would the child nodes in xsl:copy-of do?



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com