[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Keys with duplicates should be simple
On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 09:06:56PM +0000, David Carlisle scripsit: > On 01/02/2014 00:11, Graydon wrote: > >I still want a better syntax for using negated except in predicates, > >such as: > > > >div[not(* except (heading,para))] > > div[every $e in * satisfies $e/(self::heading or self::para)] That's equivalent, it's conceptually clearer if people are comfortable with slash-sequence, but I'm not sure it's clearer as a syntactical expression. I think I mostly want something like div[only(heading,para)] but that raises the question of what only() would do with comments and processing instructions. (And yes, I could perfectly well write a local:only().) -- Graydon
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|