[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Does the count() function require access to the wh

Subject: Re: Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:19:13 +0000
Re:  Does the count() function require access to the wh
On 12/01/2014 11:10, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
A couple days ago Michael Kay wrote:

Inspection operations on an element are operations that can be
performed while positioned at the start tag.

Inspection operations include: count(), exists(), name().

Absorption operations are operations that require access to the whole
subtree.

Absorption operations include: string(), data(), xsl:value-of

Michael, doesn't the count() function require access to the whole
subtree? How would a count be conducted by sitting at the top of a
subtree? Perhaps you meant to say that the count() function is an
absorption operation?

/Roger


consider count(/) and string(/)


count() can return 1 straight away, whereas string() needs to process the entire tree below /.

David

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.