[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: Does the count() function require access to the wh
Subject: Re: Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:19:13 +0000
|
On 12/01/2014 11:10, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
A couple days ago Michael Kay wrote:
Inspection operations on an element are operations that can be
performed while positioned at the start tag.
Inspection operations include: count(), exists(), name().
Absorption operations are operations that require access to the whole
subtree.
Absorption operations include: string(), data(), xsl:value-of
Michael, doesn't the count() function require access to the whole
subtree? How would a count be conducted by sitting at the top of a
subtree? Perhaps you meant to say that the count() function is an
absorption operation?
/Roger
consider count(/) and string(/)
count() can return 1 straight away, whereas string() needs to process
the entire tree below /.
David
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0 |
|
Atom 0.3 |
|
|