[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Streaming best practice: no user-defined functions

Subject: Re: Streaming best practice: no user-defined functions with node parameters ... Do you agree?
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:10:01 -0500
Re:  Streaming best practice: no user-defined functions
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> But does it mean we won't be able (when
>> streaming) to call functions even with temporary trees or snapshots?
>
> In the current draft (which we're working hard to get the final bugs out
of...) we've re-introduced a kind of data-flow analysis that enables us to
distinguish statically whether the node being passed to a function is a
streamed node or not. There's no problem with passing "ordinary" nodes to a
function (or template) parameter, it's only streamed nodes that are
problematic.

Yes, excellent. Distinguishing between streamed nodes and nodes in
trees that are entirely accessible makes sense.

Cheers, Wendell

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.