Re: xsl 2.0?

Play the video

Subject: Re: xsl 2.0?
From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:05:28 +0000

On 02/11/13 07:23, Toshihiko Makita wrote:
[...]

3. I beleive that XSL-FO is most suitable techinology for formatting XML
documents. Does CSS techinology become the complete alternative of the
XSL-FO?

Bear in mind that you can also produce PDF by using XSLT[2] to generate LaTeX. I know this is heresy to many people here, but it provides a useful path to PDF that is unencumbered, and allows re-use of the significant body of knowledge of documents and their formatting requirements that is a part of the LaTeX ecosystem.

///Peter

Current Thread

Re: xsl 2.0?, (continued)
- Kevin Brown - 2 Nov 2013 07:42:25 -0000
- Toshihiko Makita - 2 Nov 2013 15:42:08 -0000
  - Liam R E Quin - 2 Nov 2013 20:18:25 -0000
- Toshihiko Makita - 4 Nov 2013 10:23:54 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: xsl 2.0?, Peter West	Thread	Re: xsl 2.0?, Kevin Brown
Re: xsl 2.0?, Wayne Brissette	Date	Re: Data science, data analyt, Wendell Piez
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >