[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: xsl 2.0?
On 02/11/13 07:23, Toshihiko Makita wrote:
Dear Quin Insufficient support from W3C members. 2. What is the main cause that XSL-FO 2.0 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-xslfo20-20120117/) has been failed? I don't think it did 'fail'. 3. I beleive that XSL-FO is most suitable techinology for formatting XML documents. Does CSS techinology become the complete alternative of the XSL-FO? Not yet is the honest answer. Watch the CSS space for developments, or join W3C and help development in that direction. There's a long way to go. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|