[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 construct

Subject: Re: Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 constructs faster?
From: TW <zupftom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:53:02 +0100
Re:  Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 construct
2012/2/9 Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> I like pure XPath solutions because they are less verbose, but I find
>> "full" XSLT less restricting and easier to debug (especially when I
>> want to check what variable holds what value).
>
> Since about 6 months oXygen has implemented stepping through an XPath
> expression (not sure about setting breakpoints). Thus there should be
> no difference in debugging XPath code and XSLT code with oXygen.
>

Interesting.  How exactly does that work?

Thomas W.

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.