[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Cheaper to prepend or append an item to a sequence

Subject: Re: Cheaper to prepend or append an item to a sequence?
From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:40:50 +0000
Re:  Cheaper to prepend or append an item to a sequence
On 22/02/2011 14:25, Andrew Welch wrote:
<report test="@id = (//@id[not(ancestor::meta)] except @id)">
The most
inefficient part of this is the test [not(ancestor::meta)] - it would be
nice if Saxon were smart enough to remember while scanning the elements
whether it has passed more meta start-tags than end-tags - but sadly, it
isn't.
couldn't that be rewritten as:

@id = //@id except (@id, //meta//@id)

to avoid the ancestor walk?

It could. Whether it would be faster depends on the volumetrics - something Saxon doesn't have any knowledge of at the time it makes optimization decisions.


Michael Kay Saxonica

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.