Cart
|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Thought i knew this but i guess not
 On 2/22/2011 5:19 PM, russurquhart1@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: I used contains because filter could have the value filter="filter1,filter10,filter2" and i thought having a @filter='filter1' would fail for the previous string. If that is not the case, i'll change it, but i thought i tried that one time and it didn't work. No, you're right, = won't work for this, in XSLT 1.0. Yet another reason among many to prefer XSLT 2.0 for this kind of thing is that it makes this sort of problem considerably more tractable: "tokenize(@filter,',\s*') = ('filter1','filter10')". It's much harder to deal with in unextended XSLT 1.0: you either have to work with very carefully constrained values, or get into recursive templates to handle the strings. Or both. Or model the information in a way more amenable to XSLT 1.0. Cheers, Wendell -- ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
