Re: previous sibiling node value

I am confused, your last message is difficult to understand and
doesn't contain any question.



On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:17 AM, ram <ram_kurra@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks that perfectly works.
> B  B  B  let us suppose if i get qmNumber as 01 then i need to get BRKQM
> if i get qmNumber is 02 then i need to get BEKQM
> i have written the logic like below but I am not able to go second QMNUmber
>
> if QMNumber is 2 its failing.Its showign only qmnumber 1
>
> $qmNumberFromContext is variable which will come either 01/02
> $serviceType is Response
>
> <xsl:choose>
> B  B  B  B <xsl:when test="$serviceType/QMNumber=$qmNumberFromContext">
> B  B  B  B  B <xsl:value-of
> B  B  B  B 
B select="$qmNumberFromContext/precedingibling::QMName[1]/text()"/>
>
> B  B  B  B </xsl:when>
> B  B  B  B  <xsl:otherwise/>
>
> </xsl:choose>
> --- On Mon, 15/11/10, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re:  previous sibiling node value
>> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Monday, 15 November, 2010, 12:22 AM
>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:46 AM, ram
>> <ram_kurra@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > B  I am trying to get the current node's
>> preceding-sibling node value.
>> > Here is my xml
>> >
>> >
>> > B <Policy Service="response">
>> > B  B  B <QMName>BRKQM</QMName>>
>> > B  B  B <QMNumber>01</QMNumber>
>> > B  B  B <QMName>BEKQM</QMName>>
>> > B  B  B <QMNumber>02</QMNumber>
>> >
>> B <RequestQueue>TEST.RSP</RequestQueue>
>> > B  </Policy>
>> > B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  Let us suppose if my qmNumber
>> is 02 i need to go to prevoius node QMName and get BEKQM.
>> > B  B  B  B  B How can i do this .
>>
>>
>> Use:
>>
>> /*/QMNumber[. = 2]/preceding-sibling::QMName[1]/text()
>>
>> This expression can be used in many xslt instuctions -- in
>> attributes
>> such as "select" or "test" .
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Dimitre Novatchev
>> ---------------------------------------
>> Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant
>> intelligence.
>> ---------------------------------------
>> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
>> -------------------------------------
>> Never fight an inanimate object
>> -------------------------------------
>> You've achieved success in your field when you don't know
>> whether what
>> you're doing is work or play
>
>



--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
I enjoy the massacre of ads. This sentence will slaughter ads without
a messy bloodbath.