[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Efficient XSLT range lookups / questions

Subject: Re: Efficient XSLT range lookups / questions
From: Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:33:37 +0200
Re:  Efficient XSLT range lookups / questions
Dimitre,

> Have you compared these to using just a single binary search function,
> as the one offered by FXSL for at least the last six years?

because I wanted to compare optimal performance I did the minimal
binary search implementation for the problem myself.

In [1] I describe a simple input format and provide a stylesheet for
generating the optimal binary decision stylesheet from that (by
the measurements done that outperforms binary search on a XML tree).

Remember that the investigation was for XSLT 1 and XSLT 2 processors.

May you please point out on how to setup a test with f:binSearch()
on the simple range lookup input format in [1]?

Since it works on XSLT 2.0 sequences probably that will get better
results than my binary search based on nodesets.


[1]
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=348576#1453965
6


Mit besten Gruessen / Best wishes,

Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt
Developer, XML Compiler, L3
Fixpack team lead
WebSphere DataPower SOA Appliances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294



From:       Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
To:         xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:       10/05/2010 09:58 PM
Subject:    Re:  Efficient XSLT range lookups / questions



Have you compared these to using just a single binary search function,
as the one offered by FXSL for at least the last six years?

http://fxsl.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fxsl/fxsl-xslt2/f/func-binSearch.xsl?r
evision=1.4&view=markup



 <xsl:function name="f:binSearch" as="xs:boolean">
   <xsl:param name="pSeq" as="item()+"/>
   <xsl:param name="pVal" as="item()"/>
   <xsl:param name="pStart" as="item()"/>
   <xsl:param name="pEnd" as="item()"/>

   <xsl:sequence select=
    "if($pStart gt $pEnd) then false()
       else
        for $mid in ($pStart + $pEnd) idiv 2,
             $sVal in $pSeq[$mid]
           return
             if($sVal eq $pVal) then true()
             else
                if($sVal lt $pVal)
                   then f:binSearch($pSeq, $pVal, $mid+1, $pEnd)
                else
                  f:binSearch($pSeq, $pVal, $pStart, $mid - 1)
       "/>
 </xsl:function>


--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play




On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt
<STAMMW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I got notice of an interesting scenario needing a huge amount of range
> lookups in XSLT (billions per year with more than 20000 different
ranges).
>
>
> My web searches prior to this only showed range lookups of complexity
> linear in the number of ranges to be searched. I am sure that my searches
> are not perfect and I just missed relevant postings.
> Are there any relevant postings?
>
>
> Since the ranges change rarely precomputing was a good option.
>
> I compared binary search trees against stylesheets with a binary search
> structure.
>
> Findings based on experiments with saxon9he and DataPower XSLT processor
> [1]:
> - binary outperforms linear
> - binary stylesheets outperform binary XML searchtrees
> - in case the XSLT processor supports document and/or stylesheet caching
>  the lookup performance remains good even for single lookups (logarithmic
>  in depth of search tree; DataPower supports both, and web searches
> indicate
>  that .net framework also supports document/stylesheet caching)
>
> Are there even better alternatives for doing quick range lookups?
>
>
> [1] "Efficient XSLT range lookups"
>
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=348576&tstart=
0

>
>
> Mit besten Gruessen / Best wishes,
>
> Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt
> Developer, XML Compiler, L3
> Fixpack team lead
> WebSphere DataPower SOA Appliances
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter
> Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.