[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLT for Mashups
you should take a look at xcruciate, http://www.xcruciate.co.uk/ I can see some synergy between these 2 projects. J On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Alex Clark <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On the other hand, we (W3C) did not define explicit places to put, say, >> SQL or SPARQL or other syntax to configure such inputs; for my own part >> I'd be supportive of such an idea. > > Excellent, one supporter so far. :) I'm happy to help define this. > >> Having said all that, I also wonder whether XQuery isn't a better >> starting-point for mashups... not because of differences in power >> of the languages, but because of different focus of implementations. > > FWIW: We chose XSL over XQuery mainly for the ability to do schema > validation. We wanted third parties to add custom tags (similar to > extensions in XSL). Vendors could then create schemas that would ensure the > templates only contained tags supported by that vendor.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|