Re: are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNam

On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:19 +1030, Justin Johansson wrote:

> He's mainly on about the conundrum surrounding XML 5th edition to which
> my thoughts were:
> 
>   "As an implementor, this Qname change presents for me yet another hurdle.

It doesn't change it a whole lot from XML 1.1.  You were supporting
XML 1.1, right?  If no, what hope would there have been that you'd
have supported an XML 1.2? Even less. If yes, quit complaining :-)

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org