Re: Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?

XRX not mean XML databases only - for example you can use eXist-db
only as application server just like any "standalone" application
server and standalone database (maybe even not "xml-enabled" like
MySQL)

2010/1/18 Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>:
> I don't think "XRX" literally means just those 3 parts, it means an
> XML Server back end, XQuery and XSLT as the application code
> generating (X)HTML and/or XForms for the front end, passing around XML
> over http (some of the REST crowd get upset about using REST loosely)
>
> The key ingredients are the XML Server and the fact that its end-to-end
XML.
>
>
> 2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> An unexpected but nevertheless an interesting answer.
>>
>> FWIW, From the first sentence of the Wikipedia writeup on XRX:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XRX_(web_application_architecture)
>>
>> "In software development XRX is a web application architecture based on
>> XForms, REST and XQuery."
>>
>> Not a mention of XSLT there so to challenge your response ...
>>
>> Would it be reasonable to rephrase my question as:
>>
>> "Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT 2 for XRX), does the XRX community really
want
>> one?"
>>
>> (Notwithstanding, and with no disrespect to, Saxon of course).
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Justin Johansson
>>
>>
>
> --
> Andrew Welch
> http://andrewjwelch.com
> Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/